Si no tuviera 63 años, estaría en el monte con un KalashniKov.
If I was not 63, would be on the mountain with a Kalashnikov.
如果我不是63，將與卡拉什尼科夫在山上。
La humanidad, tiene medios de sobra, para que 10.000 millones de habitantes, vivan bien, dentro de un capitalismo moderado, con pocos ricos, pocos pobres y mucha clase media, que viviendo bien, consume y hace más ricos a los ricos.
Pero la avaricia extrema, enfermiza, de los poderosos, hace que haya muchos millones de personas, pasando penurias y que además, no sean más que una carga social, ya que cuestan, no aportan y no consumen, para que los ricos sean cada vez más ricos.
Entonces, ¿Cómo es posible que los muy ricos de verdad, los que ponen y quitan gobiernos, manipulando a la opinión pública, no se hayan percatado, de que el sistema actual, no les rinde todo lo que podría y que además, les cuesta en guerras, seguridad, sanidad, terrorismo , donativos y sobre todo en número de clientes?
Si manteniendo el sistema actual, hacemos que la capacidad adquisitiva de los hoy pobres (sobre todo el tercer mundo), e incluso La de la clase medie existente, aumente progresivamente, de forma controlada, tendremos más clientes, más ingresos y más gente contenta, con la correspondiente disminución de conflictos de todas clases.
Ese aumento de bienestar general, tiene que ser controlada, para que la gente, tenga mucho que perder, lo que significa, que tengan acceso a vivienda, equipada, coches, salud pública y educación, además de infraestructuras que faciliten el intercambio de ideas, mediante viajes y migraciones, pero en una buena situación general la gente intercambiara mensajes positivos sobre el bienestar y casi nadie, querrá alterar o poner en riesgo su modus vivendi.
El capitalismo, no es el mejor sistema, pero no parece haber otro mejor. Como todo, o humano, hay que mejorarlo para que siga vigente y el propio sistema, anule intentos banales de promover otras filosofías económicas y sociales.
La humanidad, si promueve el bienestar general mínimo, puede conseguir una sociedad más justa, más feliz y más compradora y ella misma, impediría por anulación, los movimientos revolucionarios relevantes. Algo siempre quedaría, pero incluso esto sería bueno para que la sociedad, tuviese un enemigo común, que no les ofreciese mas que perdida de calidad de vida.
En circunstancias de bien estar general como el que preconizo, habría que establecer un sistema económico general de forma que todos pudiesen progresar en bien estar y sobre todo tener un acceso general a la educación y la salud, sin olvidar un poder adquisitivo suficiente, para que la gente siga comprando, los bienes que de forma bien estudiada, habría que ir lanzando al mercado, o que a su vez impulsaría cada vez más, a un aumento de presupuesto para investigación y desarrollo, que continuamente lanzase nuevos bienes y servicios.
En estas circunstancias, si los muy ricos y poderosos, no se vuelven locos (este es el peligro), la clase dirigente, tendría cada vez más poder para pensar nuevas estrategias de mejora en las condiciones generales de vida y al mismo tiempo, estarían en una posición de super-elite, que les permitiría ser los primeros en disfrutar de los nuevos bienes y servicios que se fuesen a lanzar al mercado y a su vez, tendrían cada vez más poder.
Habría que poner controles, como un consejo de ancianos que controlase a los poderosos, por si alguno se vuelve como Hitler o Stalin, por ejemplo y con una policía a su servicio, capaz de sacar del sistema, a los dirigentes que perdiesen el juicio.
El sistema, debiera ser tal, que se produjese un control de la natalidad, de forma que se renueven las generaciones, pero siempre con un límite de 10.000 millones de habitantes.
Una eficaz policía, debiera de asegurar, que la población estuviese suficientemente protegida, frente a los que por naturaleza genética, son criminales.
Los vagos, os que genéticamente no quieren trabajar, constituirían en esta sociedad capitalista, la clase delos pobres (estoa es inevitable), pero siempre con sus necesidades primordiales cubiertas).
El control de la natalidad, tendría dos vertientes, el de autocontrol y el estatal cuando fuese necesario.
Pero hay que buscar convencer a los poderosos, que con una generalización del bienestar social, ellos también saldrían ganando.
TRANSLATION
Humanity , having means to spare, to 10,000 million, live well , within a moderate capitalism , with few rich , poor and very few middle class who live well , eat and make the rich richer .
But extreme greed , unhealthy , of the powerful, does have many millions of people , through hardship and also , not just a social burden , costing , do not contribute and do not consume , so that the rich are increasingly richer.
So what is it that the very rich indeed, those who put and remove governments , manipulating public opinion, did not realize , that the current system did not yield anything that could and also costs them in wars , security , health , terrorism, donations and especially the number of clients ?
If maintaining the current system , we make the purchasing power of the poor today (especially the third world) , and even the existing mediate class , gradually increase , in a controlled manner , we will have more customers , more revenue and more people happy , with a corresponding decrease in conflicts of all kinds.
This increase in general welfare, has to be controlled so that people have a lot to lose , meaning that access to shelter , equipped cars , public health and education, and infrastructure to facilitate the exchange of ideas, through travel and migration, but in good shape overall positive messages to exchange people on welfare and hardly anyone will want to alter or jeopardize their modus vivendi .
Capitalism is the best system, but there seems to be a better one. Like everything, or human , must be improved to keep current and the system itself , aside banal attempts to promote other economic and social philosophies .
Humanity , if it promotes the general welfare minimum, you can get a fairer, happier and more buying and itself, prevent cancelation , revolutionary movements relevant . Something always would , but even this would be good for society , had a common enemy , they do not offer more than quality of life loss .
In circumstances of general welfare as I am advocating , would have to establish a general economic system so that all could progress in well-being and above all have general access to education and health , not to mention sufficient purchasing power , so that people keep buying , goods so well studied, would have to go onto the market , or that would in turn encourage more and more, to increased research and development budget , continually hurl new goods and services.
In these circumstances, if the very rich and powerful , do not go crazy ( this is the danger ) , the ruling class would ever be able to think of new strategies for improving general living conditions and at the same time, would be in a position of super- elite , which would allow them to be the first to enjoy the new goods and services were launched onto the market and in turn, have more and more power .
Controls should be put as a council of elders that would control the powerful, in case one becomes like Hitler or Stalin , for example, and with a police service capable of out of the system, the leaders their losing the trial.
The system should be such that it would produce birth control , so as to renew the generations, but always with a limit of 10,000 million.
An effective police should ensure, that the people were sufficiently protected against those who by nature genetics, are criminals.
The vague , that genetically you want to work , would in this capitalist society , class poor models ( slack is inevitable ) , but always with their basic needs covered ) .
The birth control would have two aspects, that of self-control and state when necessary .
But we must seek to convince the powerful, who with a generalization of social welfare , they would too .
But extreme greed , unhealthy , of the powerful, does have many millions of people , through hardship and also , not just a social burden , costing , do not contribute and do not consume , so that the rich are increasingly richer.
So what is it that the very rich indeed, those who put and remove governments , manipulating public opinion, did not realize , that the current system did not yield anything that could and also costs them in wars , security , health , terrorism, donations and especially the number of clients ?
If maintaining the current system , we make the purchasing power of the poor today (especially the third world) , and even the existing mediate class , gradually increase , in a controlled manner , we will have more customers , more revenue and more people happy , with a corresponding decrease in conflicts of all kinds.
This increase in general welfare, has to be controlled so that people have a lot to lose , meaning that access to shelter , equipped cars , public health and education, and infrastructure to facilitate the exchange of ideas, through travel and migration, but in good shape overall positive messages to exchange people on welfare and hardly anyone will want to alter or jeopardize their modus vivendi .
Capitalism is the best system, but there seems to be a better one. Like everything, or human , must be improved to keep current and the system itself , aside banal attempts to promote other economic and social philosophies .
Humanity , if it promotes the general welfare minimum, you can get a fairer, happier and more buying and itself, prevent cancelation , revolutionary movements relevant . Something always would , but even this would be good for society , had a common enemy , they do not offer more than quality of life loss .
In circumstances of general welfare as I am advocating , would have to establish a general economic system so that all could progress in well-being and above all have general access to education and health , not to mention sufficient purchasing power , so that people keep buying , goods so well studied, would have to go onto the market , or that would in turn encourage more and more, to increased research and development budget , continually hurl new goods and services.
In these circumstances, if the very rich and powerful , do not go crazy ( this is the danger ) , the ruling class would ever be able to think of new strategies for improving general living conditions and at the same time, would be in a position of super- elite , which would allow them to be the first to enjoy the new goods and services were launched onto the market and in turn, have more and more power .
Controls should be put as a council of elders that would control the powerful, in case one becomes like Hitler or Stalin , for example, and with a police service capable of out of the system, the leaders their losing the trial.
The system should be such that it would produce birth control , so as to renew the generations, but always with a limit of 10,000 million.
An effective police should ensure, that the people were sufficiently protected against those who by nature genetics, are criminals.
The vague , that genetically you want to work , would in this capitalist society , class poor models ( slack is inevitable ) , but always with their basic needs covered ) .
The birth control would have two aspects, that of self-control and state when necessary .
But we must seek to convince the powerful, who with a generalization of social welfare , they would too .
人性化，具有有餘，至10,000億美元，好好過日子，在一個溫和的資本主義，有少數富人，窮人和極少數中產階級的人生活得很好，吃，使富者愈富。
但極端貪婪的，不健康的，強大的，有數百萬人，通過艱苦，也不僅僅是社會的負擔，成本，不貢獻，不消耗，使富人越來越多更加豐富。
那麼，究竟是什麼，非常豐富，事實上，那些付諸表決，並刪除政府，操縱輿論，並沒有意識到，現行的制度沒有產生任何可能，也花費他們在戰爭中，安全，衛生，恐怖主義，捐款，尤其是客戶端的數量嗎？
如果保持目前的系統，我們今天窮人的購買力（特別是第三世界） ，甚至現有的調解類，逐漸增加，在控制的方式，我們將擁有更多的客戶，更多的收入和更多的人幸福，在各種衝突，並相應減少。
普遍福利的增加，已被控制，使人們有失去的東西很多，這意味著，獲得住房，配車，公共衛生，教育，基礎設施，以促進思想交流，通過旅行和遷移，但在良好的形狀整體正面消息要交換人的福利和幾乎沒有人會想改變或危及他們的權宜之計。
資本主義是最好的制度，但似乎有一個更好的。一切，或人類一樣，必須改進，保持電流和系統本身，拋開平庸的嘗試，以促進經濟和社會哲學。
人性化，如果它促進普遍福利最低，你可以得到一個更公平，更快樂，更多的買盤和本身，防止取消，有關的革命運動。東西總是會，但即使這將是對社會有益，有一個共同的敵人，他們沒有提供更多的生命損失比質量。
在我所主張的一般福利的情況下，將不得不建立一個一般的經濟體系，使所有進步的福祉及以上的所有教育和健康都具有一般訪問，更何況足夠的購買力，從而使不斷有人購買，貨物如此出色的研究，將有到市場去，或者會鼓勵越來越多，增加研發預算，不斷投新的商品和服務。
在這種情況下，如果非常豐富和強大，不發瘋（這是危險的） ，統治階級將永遠是能夠為改善生活條件一般，同時認為新的戰略，將在超級精英的位置，這將讓他們成為第一個享受新的商品和服務，在市場上推出，反過來，有越來越多的權力。
應該把它作為一個強大的長老，將控制議會控制的情況下，變成像希特勒或斯大林，例如，與警察服務能夠淘汰制度，領導他們失去了審判。
應該是這樣的，它會產生節育系統，以更新幾代，但總是上限為10,000萬元。
應確保一個有效的警察，使百姓得到了充分保護，對那些自然遺傳學誰，都是罪犯。
模糊，轉基因，你想工作，在這個資本主義社會，階級不良模型（鬆弛是不可避免的） ，但始終與他們的基本需要覆蓋） 。
節育將有兩個方面，即自我控制和必要時的狀態。
但是，我們必須設法說服強大的，人與社會福利的泛化，他們也會這樣。
但極端貪婪的，不健康的，強大的，有數百萬人，通過艱苦，也不僅僅是社會的負擔，成本，不貢獻，不消耗，使富人越來越多更加豐富。
那麼，究竟是什麼，非常豐富，事實上，那些付諸表決，並刪除政府，操縱輿論，並沒有意識到，現行的制度沒有產生任何可能，也花費他們在戰爭中，安全，衛生，恐怖主義，捐款，尤其是客戶端的數量嗎？
如果保持目前的系統，我們今天窮人的購買力（特別是第三世界） ，甚至現有的調解類，逐漸增加，在控制的方式，我們將擁有更多的客戶，更多的收入和更多的人幸福，在各種衝突，並相應減少。
普遍福利的增加，已被控制，使人們有失去的東西很多，這意味著，獲得住房，配車，公共衛生，教育，基礎設施，以促進思想交流，通過旅行和遷移，但在良好的形狀整體正面消息要交換人的福利和幾乎沒有人會想改變或危及他們的權宜之計。
資本主義是最好的制度，但似乎有一個更好的。一切，或人類一樣，必須改進，保持電流和系統本身，拋開平庸的嘗試，以促進經濟和社會哲學。
人性化，如果它促進普遍福利最低，你可以得到一個更公平，更快樂，更多的買盤和本身，防止取消，有關的革命運動。東西總是會，但即使這將是對社會有益，有一個共同的敵人，他們沒有提供更多的生命損失比質量。
在我所主張的一般福利的情況下，將不得不建立一個一般的經濟體系，使所有進步的福祉及以上的所有教育和健康都具有一般訪問，更何況足夠的購買力，從而使不斷有人購買，貨物如此出色的研究，將有到市場去，或者會鼓勵越來越多，增加研發預算，不斷投新的商品和服務。
在這種情況下，如果非常豐富和強大，不發瘋（這是危險的） ，統治階級將永遠是能夠為改善生活條件一般，同時認為新的戰略，將在超級精英的位置，這將讓他們成為第一個享受新的商品和服務，在市場上推出，反過來，有越來越多的權力。
應該把它作為一個強大的長老，將控制議會控制的情況下，變成像希特勒或斯大林，例如，與警察服務能夠淘汰制度，領導他們失去了審判。
應該是這樣的，它會產生節育系統，以更新幾代，但總是上限為10,000萬元。
應確保一個有效的警察，使百姓得到了充分保護，對那些自然遺傳學誰，都是罪犯。
模糊，轉基因，你想工作，在這個資本主義社會，階級不良模型（鬆弛是不可避免的） ，但始終與他們的基本需要覆蓋） 。
節育將有兩個方面，即自我控制和必要時的狀態。
但是，我們必須設法說服強大的，人與社會福利的泛化，他們也會這樣。
Deshacer cambios
Rénxìng huà, jùyǒu yǒuyú, zhì 10,000 yì měiyuán, hǎohǎo guòrìzi, zài yīgè wēnhé de zīběn zhǔyì, yǒu shǎoshù fù rén, qióng rén hé jí shǎoshù zhōngchǎn jiējí de rén shēnghuó de hěn hǎo, chī, shǐ fù zhě yù fù.
Dàn jíduān tānlán de, bùjiànkāng de, qiángdà de, yǒu shù bǎi wàn rén, tōngguò jiānkǔ, yě bùjǐn jǐn shì shèhuì de fùdān, chéngběn, bù gòngxiàn, bù xiāohào, shǐ fù rén yuè lái yuè duō Gèngjiā fēngfù.
Nàme, jiùjìng shì shénme, fēicháng fēngfù, shìshí shàng, nàxiē fù zhū biǎojué, bìng shānchú zhèngfǔ, cāozòng yúlùn, bìng méiyǒu yìshí dào, xiànxíng de zhìdù méiyǒu chǎnshēng rènhé kěnéng, yě huāfèi tāmen Zài zhànzhēng zhōng, ānquán, wèishēng, kǒngbù zhǔyì, juānkuǎn, yóuqí shì kèhù duāndì shùliàng ma?
Rúguǒ bǎochí mùqián de xìtǒng, wǒmen jīntiān qióng rén de gòumǎilì (tèbié shì dì sān shìjiè), shènzhì xiànyǒu de tiáojiě lèi, zhújiàn zēngjiā, zài kòngzhì de fāngshì, wǒmen jiāng yǒngyǒu gèng duō de kèhù, gèng duō de shōurù hé gèng duō de rén xìngfú, Zài gèzhǒng chōngtú, bìng xiāngyìng jiǎnshǎo.
Pǔbiàn fúlì de zēngjiā, yǐ bèi kòngzhì, shǐ rénmen yǒu shīqù de dōngxi hěnduō, zhè yìwèizhe, huòdé zhùfáng, pèichē, gōnggòng wèishēng, jiàoyù, jīchǔ shèshī, yǐ cùjìn sīxiǎng jiāoliú, Tōngguò lǚxíng hé qiānyí, dàn zài liánghǎo de xíngzhuàng zhěngtǐ zhèngmiàn xiāoxi yào jiāohuàn rén de fúlì hé jīhū méiyǒu rén huì xiǎng gǎibiàn huò wéijí tāmen de quányí zhī jì.
Zīběn zhǔyì shì zuì hǎo de zhìdù, dàn sìhū yǒu yīgè gèng hǎo de. Yīqiè, huò rénlèi yīyàng, bìxū gǎijìn, bǎochí diànliú hé xìtǒng běnshēn, pāo kāi píngyōng de chángshì, yǐ cùjìn jīngjì hé shèhuì zhéxué.
Rénxìng huà, rúguǒ tā cùjìn pǔbiàn fúlì zuìdī, nǐ kěyǐ dédào yīgè gèng gōngpíng, gèng kuàilè, gèng duō de mǎi pán hé běnshēn, fángzhǐ qǔxiāo, yǒuguān de gémìng yùndòng. Dōngxi zǒng shì huì, dàn jíshǐ zhè jiāng shì duì shèhuì yǒuyì, yǒu yīgè gòngtóng de dírén, tāmen méiyǒu tígōng gèng duō de shēngmìng sǔnshī bǐ zhìliàng.
Zài wǒ suǒ zhǔzhāng de yībān fúlì de qíngkuàng xià, jiāng bùdé bù jiànlì yīgè yībān de jīngjì tǐxì, shǐ suǒyǒu jìnbù de fúzhǐ jí yǐshàng de suǒyǒu jiàoyù hé jiànkāng dōu jùyǒu yībān fǎngwèn, gèng hékuàng zúgòu de gòumǎilì, cóng'ér shǐ Bùduàn yǒurén gòumǎi, huòwù rúcǐ chūsè de yánjiū, jiāng yǒu dào shìchǎng qù, huòzhě huì gǔlì yuè lái yuè duō, zēngjiā yánfā yùsuàn, bùduàn tóu xīn de shāngpǐn hé fúwù.
Zài zhè zhǒng qíngkuàng xià, rúguǒ fēicháng fēngfù hé qiángdà, bù fāfēng (zhè shì wéixiǎn de), tǒngzhì jiējí jiāng yǒngyuǎn shì nénggòu wèi gǎishàn shēnghuó tiáojiàn yībān, tóngshí rènwéi xīn de zhànlüè, jiàng zài Chāojí jīngyīng de wèizhì, zhè jiāng ràng tāmen chéngwéi dì yī gè xiǎngshòu xīn de shāngpǐn hé fúwù, zài shìchǎng shàng tuīchū, fǎn guòlái, yǒu yuè lái yuè duō de quánlì.
Yīnggāi bǎ tā zuòwéi yīgè qiángdà de cháng lǎo, jiāng kòngzhì yìhuì kòngzhì de qíngkuàng xià, biànchéng xiàng xītèlēi huò sīdàlín, lìrú, yǔ jǐngchá fúwù nénggòu táotài zhìdù, lǐngdǎo tāmen shīqùle shěnpàn.
Yīnggāi shì zhèyàng de, tā huì chǎnshēng jiéyù xìtǒng, yǐ gēngxīn jǐdài, dàn zǒng shì shàngxiàn wéi 10,000 wàn yuán.
Yīng quèbǎo yīgè yǒuxiào de jǐngchá, shǐ bǎixìng dédàole chōngfèn bǎohù, duì nàxiē zìrán yíchuán xué shuí, dōu shì zuìfàn.
Móhú, zhuǎnjīyīn, nǐ xiǎng gōngzuò, zài zhège zīběn zhǔyì shèhuì, jiējí bùliáng móxíng (sōngchí shì bùkě bìmiǎn de), dàn shǐzhōng yǔ tāmen de jīběn xūyào fùgài).
Jiéyù jiāng yǒu liǎng gè fāngmiàn, jí zìwǒ kòngzhì hé bìyào shí de zhuàngtài.
Dànshì, wǒmen bìxū shèfǎ shuōfú qiángdà de, rén yǔ shèhuì fúlì de fàn huà, tāmen yě huì zhèyàng.
Dàn jíduān tānlán de, bùjiànkāng de, qiángdà de, yǒu shù bǎi wàn rén, tōngguò jiānkǔ, yě bùjǐn jǐn shì shèhuì de fùdān, chéngběn, bù gòngxiàn, bù xiāohào, shǐ fù rén yuè lái yuè duō Gèngjiā fēngfù.
Nàme, jiùjìng shì shénme, fēicháng fēngfù, shìshí shàng, nàxiē fù zhū biǎojué, bìng shānchú zhèngfǔ, cāozòng yúlùn, bìng méiyǒu yìshí dào, xiànxíng de zhìdù méiyǒu chǎnshēng rènhé kěnéng, yě huāfèi tāmen Zài zhànzhēng zhōng, ānquán, wèishēng, kǒngbù zhǔyì, juānkuǎn, yóuqí shì kèhù duāndì shùliàng ma?
Rúguǒ bǎochí mùqián de xìtǒng, wǒmen jīntiān qióng rén de gòumǎilì (tèbié shì dì sān shìjiè), shènzhì xiànyǒu de tiáojiě lèi, zhújiàn zēngjiā, zài kòngzhì de fāngshì, wǒmen jiāng yǒngyǒu gèng duō de kèhù, gèng duō de shōurù hé gèng duō de rén xìngfú, Zài gèzhǒng chōngtú, bìng xiāngyìng jiǎnshǎo.
Pǔbiàn fúlì de zēngjiā, yǐ bèi kòngzhì, shǐ rénmen yǒu shīqù de dōngxi hěnduō, zhè yìwèizhe, huòdé zhùfáng, pèichē, gōnggòng wèishēng, jiàoyù, jīchǔ shèshī, yǐ cùjìn sīxiǎng jiāoliú, Tōngguò lǚxíng hé qiānyí, dàn zài liánghǎo de xíngzhuàng zhěngtǐ zhèngmiàn xiāoxi yào jiāohuàn rén de fúlì hé jīhū méiyǒu rén huì xiǎng gǎibiàn huò wéijí tāmen de quányí zhī jì.
Zīběn zhǔyì shì zuì hǎo de zhìdù, dàn sìhū yǒu yīgè gèng hǎo de. Yīqiè, huò rénlèi yīyàng, bìxū gǎijìn, bǎochí diànliú hé xìtǒng běnshēn, pāo kāi píngyōng de chángshì, yǐ cùjìn jīngjì hé shèhuì zhéxué.
Rénxìng huà, rúguǒ tā cùjìn pǔbiàn fúlì zuìdī, nǐ kěyǐ dédào yīgè gèng gōngpíng, gèng kuàilè, gèng duō de mǎi pán hé běnshēn, fángzhǐ qǔxiāo, yǒuguān de gémìng yùndòng. Dōngxi zǒng shì huì, dàn jíshǐ zhè jiāng shì duì shèhuì yǒuyì, yǒu yīgè gòngtóng de dírén, tāmen méiyǒu tígōng gèng duō de shēngmìng sǔnshī bǐ zhìliàng.
Zài wǒ suǒ zhǔzhāng de yībān fúlì de qíngkuàng xià, jiāng bùdé bù jiànlì yīgè yībān de jīngjì tǐxì, shǐ suǒyǒu jìnbù de fúzhǐ jí yǐshàng de suǒyǒu jiàoyù hé jiànkāng dōu jùyǒu yībān fǎngwèn, gèng hékuàng zúgòu de gòumǎilì, cóng'ér shǐ Bùduàn yǒurén gòumǎi, huòwù rúcǐ chūsè de yánjiū, jiāng yǒu dào shìchǎng qù, huòzhě huì gǔlì yuè lái yuè duō, zēngjiā yánfā yùsuàn, bùduàn tóu xīn de shāngpǐn hé fúwù.
Zài zhè zhǒng qíngkuàng xià, rúguǒ fēicháng fēngfù hé qiángdà, bù fāfēng (zhè shì wéixiǎn de), tǒngzhì jiējí jiāng yǒngyuǎn shì nénggòu wèi gǎishàn shēnghuó tiáojiàn yībān, tóngshí rènwéi xīn de zhànlüè, jiàng zài Chāojí jīngyīng de wèizhì, zhè jiāng ràng tāmen chéngwéi dì yī gè xiǎngshòu xīn de shāngpǐn hé fúwù, zài shìchǎng shàng tuīchū, fǎn guòlái, yǒu yuè lái yuè duō de quánlì.
Yīnggāi bǎ tā zuòwéi yīgè qiángdà de cháng lǎo, jiāng kòngzhì yìhuì kòngzhì de qíngkuàng xià, biànchéng xiàng xītèlēi huò sīdàlín, lìrú, yǔ jǐngchá fúwù nénggòu táotài zhìdù, lǐngdǎo tāmen shīqùle shěnpàn.
Yīnggāi shì zhèyàng de, tā huì chǎnshēng jiéyù xìtǒng, yǐ gēngxīn jǐdài, dàn zǒng shì shàngxiàn wéi 10,000 wàn yuán.
Yīng quèbǎo yīgè yǒuxiào de jǐngchá, shǐ bǎixìng dédàole chōngfèn bǎohù, duì nàxiē zìrán yíchuán xué shuí, dōu shì zuìfàn.
Móhú, zhuǎnjīyīn, nǐ xiǎng gōngzuò, zài zhège zīběn zhǔyì shèhuì, jiējí bùliáng móxíng (sōngchí shì bùkě bìmiǎn de), dàn shǐzhōng yǔ tāmen de jīběn xūyào fùgài).
Jiéyù jiāng yǒu liǎng gè fāngmiàn, jí zìwǒ kòngzhì hé bìyào shí de zhuàngtài.
Dànshì, wǒmen bìxū shèfǎ shuōfú qiángdà de, rén yǔ shèhuì fúlì de fàn huà, tāmen yě huì zhèyàng.
